Nevada Law Helps Shelter Wealth

A recent Bloomberg.com article noted that some of the nation’s wealthiest families are renting addresses in South Dakota. Why? So they can shelter wealth from the Federal Government by limiting or avoiding the Federal Estate Tax and the Federal Generation Skipping Transfer Tax (the “GSTT”).

The GSTT is another federal tax imposed on wealth transfers that is imposed in addition to the Federal Estate Tax and can be levied at each generation level. Luckily, you can limit or avoid paying these taxes by establishing your Trust in Nevada. Using Nevada as your Trust’s jurisdiction can be better than South Dakota because Nevada law allows for the creation of a completed gift, self-settled spendthrift trust (the “NVSSST”), which provides better protections than South Dakota trusts receive.

Once you have started the process of sheltering your wealth by creating a NVSSST, the next step is making sure Nevada law controls your Trust so you will achieve maximum tax benefits. As a Nevada resident, Nevada law will control. If you move to another state and still want to take advantage of Nevada’s tax-friendly trust laws, you will have to maintain a legal nexus with Nevada. You can do this by renting an address in Nevada and continuing a few key administrative tasks in State, such as having a Nevada Trustee handle paperwork and file tax returns.

You may have heard that President Obama has called for closing this dynasty trust “loophole” (the NVSSST is a dynasty trust) in his annual budget proposals. Despite the President’s call for action, Congress appears disinterested in making changes to your ability to shelter wealth through these trusts. Presumably, Congress sees no reason to act since imposing taxes on these trusts will not actually generate any federal revenue for almost 90 years—roughly the course of 3 generations from grandparent to grandchild, when a taxable distribution is expected on assets that are not sheltered from the GSTT.

This is good news for anyone who has established a NVSSST since the longer Congress procrastinates, the longer assets can remain in these “perpetually” tax-exempt trusts, growing larger over time. An example of the financial benefit used by Bloomberg.com shows that $1 million invested in a dynasty trust such as the NVSSST earning twelve percent a year would swell to $1.9 billion (yes BILLION) over ninety years. By comparison, if the investment were subject to state income tax, federal estate tax, and the GSTT, the investment would only be worth $488 million (one-fourth of the $1.9 billion) over that time.

As stated by many, “we have a tax haven in our midst” in Nevada. If you are using a NVSSST to protect your wealth, I applaud you for embracing creative and effective legal ways to reduce your taxes. If we can assist you in securing your wealth in this manner, please give me a call to discuss the options.

The Difference a Decade Makes and How Your Estate Planning Can Keep Up

By this time, the tragic death of actor Philip Seymour Hoffman at age 46 has fallen out of the news headlines. Looking beyond his celebrity and the shock of his untimely death, we now know that this unfortunate event leaves the rest of us with the chance to consider how better estate planning could have made a difference for Mr. Hoffman’s loved ones. Mr. Hoffman executed a will in 2004 that left his entire $35 million estate to the mother of his child, Marianne O’Donnell. He and Ms. O’Donnell subsequently had two more children, but never married. While Mr. Hoffman was creative in making his wishes known regarding how he wanted his first child to be raised, the will failed to provide for any future children. Just a few well-crafted sentences in the will would have resolved questions over future-born children. There is, however, even so much more Mr. Hoffman could have done to protect and provide for his loved ones.

Ten years elapsed between the moment when Mr. Hoffman executed his will and his death. During that time, the federal estate tax exclusion was changed four times. It was raised from $1 million in 2003 to $3.5 million in 2009, was repealed in 2010, but returned in 2011 when Congress created a unified federal estate and gift tax exclusion of $5 million. Mr. Hoffman’s career and, presumably his earnings, also changed during this time. In 2005, he won an Academy Award for his role in Capote, and he acted in about another 27 movies. Given this sky-rocketing career path, and the multitude of changes in the federal estate tax laws, it would have been virtually impossible for Mr. Hoffman’s 2004 will to be an adequate “estate plan” at his death in 2014 when his family had grown to three children and his monetary estate to $35 million. Even if Mr. Hoffman had lived fully to his life expectancy, the 2004 will would not have been appropriate planning. This decade of changes show us exactly why treating estate planning as a one-off transaction so often fails to meet the client’s needs.

In today’s world, life can feel like it is speeding by and it is important to remember that good estate planning is not a static set of documents. If you have merely signed a stack of documents and set them on the shelf, then your plan will be stuck in that moment. As life keeps speeding by, your plan needs to keep up. Use your estate plan as a system—it should be the foundation of property arrangements, contracts, and transactions that address and are dependent upon personal circumstances and wishes, financial matters and legal facts. All of which change over time, sometimes in pieces and sometimes as a whole. Making changes to your estate planning along the way will insure your plan keeps up with the rest of your life. We call this “moving at the speed of life,” and we encourage you to take this approach to make sure your estate planning does what you want for the benefit of your loved ones. 

Changing an Irrevocable Trust Through Trust Decanting

When you established your irrevocable trust, the purpose was to guarantee your wishes were carried out even if your beneficiaries did not fully appreciate the terms you selected for the trust. There are times, however, when changed circumstances mean your well-planned trust will not do what you had planned. Nevada has adopted a favorable trust decanting statute that grants the Trustee broad discretion to decant an irrevocable trust. Decanting is less expensive and more private than the alternative of seeking trust reformation before the Court. The process of decanting a trust in Nevada is relatively simple. The Trustee essentially empties out the existing trust into a newly created trust. It can be helpful to have the consent of the beneficiaries, but this is not required under the Nevada statute. There are plenty of reasons to consider decanting, and the primary ones are to update or amend trust provisions, to address changed circumstances, for federal or state tax planning, or to change the trust situs.

The Outdated Trust

If your trust is outdated, decanting can be a means to update or modernize trust provisions, or to make clarifications in the law governing the trust document. Decanting can be used to improve administrative provisions such as changing a trustee’s ability to delegate specific functions or decisions. It can also be a tool for combining multiple trusts so that administrative costs are reduced. Decanting may also be used to clarify governing law and insure uniform requirements for administration when the trustee and beneficiaries live in several different states.

Changed Circumstances

When a trust has become irrevocable, but circumstances have changed, trust decanting can be a means to accommodate these changes. For instance, decanting permits the transfer of assets to a supplemental needs trust that will allow a disabled beneficiary to receive public benefits. Through decanting, the distribution provisions of a trust may also be changed. For instance, instead of the trust terminating when a beneficiary reaches a certain age, the trust can be continued throughout that beneficiary’s lifetime. A more mundane, but still important, reason to decant is to correct drafting errors.

Federal and State Tax Planning

In some circumstances, trust decanting may also be used to maximize generation skipping transfer taxes. It may also help reduce or eliminate state taxes by avoiding a state’s fiduciary income tax or the interplay of different state income tax provisions. These issues require more complex planning, but the results can be financially advantageous.

Trust Situs

Decanting may be used to “migrate” or “redomicile” an irrevocable trust to a new jurisdiction. If laws in the state where the trust was drafted no longer provided the expected benefits, changing the trust situs can remedy the situation. A trust’s situs has important consequences for tax, asset protection and other factors, so this may be a significant consideration in making sure the goals and purposes of your irrevocable trust are realized.

Probate v. Non-Probate Assets: What Is the Difference?

You may have heard a wide variety of advice about probate in Nevada and how to use your estate planning to avoid being subject to the probate process. Generally, a good way to avoid the probate process is by using a Trust. It is not the only way, however. Thus, when planning your estate, we think it is important that you understand the difference between probate and non-probate assets. Probate is the process through which a court determines how to distribute your property after you die and the court will direct the distribution of probate assets to your heirs. Non-probate assets, on the other hand, will pass directly to your beneficiaries without court involvement.

The probate process includes filing a Will and appointing an executor or administrator, collecting assets, paying legally enforceable debts and expenses (including filing taxes), distributing property to heirs, and filing a final account. This can be a costly and time-consuming process, which is why many people try to avoid probate by having only non-probate assets.

Probate assets include those owned solely by the decedent, and can include the following:

Real property that is titled solely in the decedent’s name or held as a tenant in common
Personal property, such as jewelry, furniture, and automobiles
Bank accounts that are solely in the decedent’s name
An interest in a partnership, corporation, or limited liability company
Any life insurance policy or brokerage account that lists either the decedent or the estate as the beneficiary or neglects to name a living beneficiary

Non-probate assets can include the following:

Property held in joint tenancy or as tenants by the entirety
Bank or brokerage accounts held in joint tenancy or having payable on death (POD) or transfer on death (TOD) beneficiaries
Life insurance or brokerage accounts that list someone other than the decedent or estate as the beneficiary
Property held in a trust
Retirement accounts

When planning your estate, you need to consider what probate vs. non-probate property you own, and how you want that property to be distributed. For instance, your Will does not control the distribution of non-probate property. For non-probate property, the nature of your ownership interest or beneficiary designations may be controlling. For all of your property, your goal should be making an informed decision and knowing that your estate will be distributed according to your wishes…whatever those may be.

Don’t Let Your Estate Plan Waste Away on the Shelf

Do you already have an estate plan? Has that estate plan been sitting on the shelf for a number of years? If so, it may be time for a review so your planning is not derailed by your evolving life or by the ever-changing tax laws. Consider these reasons for dusting off your estate plan so it is not just expensive paper sitting on your shelf:

Do you already have an estate plan? Has that estate plan been sitting on the shelf for a number of years? If so, it may be time for a review so your planning is not derailed by your evolving life or by the ever-changing tax laws. Consider these reasons for dusting off your estate plan so it is not just expensive paper sitting on your shelf:

Does your estate plan deal only with estate taxes?
Changes in the tax laws mean good estate planning now deals with income tax planning, not just minimizing estate taxes. There are significant opportunities in this area and your estate plan should be amended to take advantage of changes in the tax laws.

Is it time to name or change guardians?
If your estate plan was created before you had children, this is one decision you need to make and document. If you do not make the decision, someone else will have to do it without your input or wishes being known. If you went through this when your children were quite young, it may be time to think of how things have changed since you first decided upon guardians. Are the guardians you named still who you want to raise your children if you were not around to do so?
Have you married, divorced, or remarried?
A change in marital status should always prompt you to revisit your estate plan so you can make sure your assets go to who you want, when you want. This means changing your bequests as well as your beneficiary designations. Since federal law trumps state law when it comes to beneficiary designations, if your ex-spouse is the named beneficiary, that is who will inherit the money regardless of what your other documents say.
Is one spouse receiving public benefits to help with nursing home expenses?
If so, an update of your estate plan could be key to the continuation of those benefits. Once someone qualifies for Medicaid, acquiring other assets must be handled through a special needs trust to avoid losing benefits. This is one update that should never be ignored.
Without updating, your estate planning documents become expensive paper wasting away on the shelf. As your life and the times evolve, make sure your estate plan does, too

Does your estate plan deal only with estate taxes?
Changes in the tax laws mean good estate planning now deals with income tax planning, not just minimizing estate taxes. There are significant opportunities in this area and your estate plan should be amended to take advantage of changes in the tax laws.

Is it time to name or change guardians?
If your estate plan was created before you had children, this is one decision you need to make and document. If you do not make the decision, someone else will have to do it without your input or wishes being known. If you went through this when your children were quite young, it may be time to think of how things have changed since you first decided upon guardians. Are the guardians you named still who you want to raise your children if you were not around to do so?
Have you married, divorced, or remarried?
A change in marital status should always prompt you to revisit your estate plan so you can make sure your assets go to who you want, when you want. This means changing your bequests as well as your beneficiary designations. Since federal law trumps state law when it comes to beneficiary designations, if your ex-spouse is the named beneficiary, that is who will inherit the money regardless of what your other documents say.
Is one spouse receiving public benefits to help with nursing home expenses?
If so, an update of your estate plan could be key to the continuation of those benefits. Once someone qualifies for Medicaid, acquiring other assets must be handled through a special needs trust to avoid losing benefits. This is one update that should never be ignored.
Without updating, your estate planning documents become expensive paper wasting away on the shelf. As your life and the times evolve, make sure your estate plan does, too